×
العربية english francais русский Deutsch فارسى اندونيسي اردو

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته.

الأعضاء الكرام ! اكتمل اليوم نصاب استقبال الفتاوى.

وغدا إن شاء الله تعالى في تمام السادسة صباحا يتم استقبال الفتاوى الجديدة.

ويمكنكم البحث في قسم الفتوى عما تريد الجواب عنه أو الاتصال المباشر

على الشيخ أ.د خالد المصلح على هذا الرقم 00966505147004

من الساعة العاشرة صباحا إلى الواحدة ظهرا 

بارك الله فيكم

إدارة موقع أ.د خالد المصلح

/ / Wiping over socks that do not cover the ankles

مشاركة هذه الفقرة WhatsApp Messenger LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Pinterest AddThis

What is the ruling on wiping over socks that do not cover the ankles? And what is the ruling on wiping over thin socks? المسح على جوارب لا تغطي الكعبين

المشاهدات:1985

What is the ruling on wiping over socks that do not cover the ankles? And what is the ruling on wiping over thin socks? المسح على جوارب لا تغطي الكعبين

الجواب

Praise be to Allah, and may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon the Messenger of Allah, his family and his companions.

As to what follows:

In response to your question, we say, and with Allah Almighty lies all success:

It is not a condition for the socks that cover the foot – according to the correct scholarly opinion – to be covering all parts of the foot completely, rather they should cover most of the foot. Meaning that most of the foot should be covered even if part of it is exposed. For example, due to the sock being short, or because the sock has a hole in it, or it is ripped. So all of this (mentioned above), does not affect the soundness of wiping over it – according to the correct opinion. And Allah Almighty has said in the verse of wudhu:

“O you who believe, when you rise to [perform] prayer, wash your faces and your forearms to the elbows and wipe over your heads and your feet…” [Al-Ma’idah 5:6]

And in another recitation: “arjulikum” – rather than “arjulakum” – “your feet”.  So one wipes over the foot if it is covered. And it is not necessary for the covering to completely close up the foot, covering it completely, whereby nothing of it is left apparent. Therefore, if the sock was lower than the ankles or had some tears in it, there is nothing wrong with wiping over it. Likewise, if it was thin, there is nothing wrong with wiping over it, because it is covering the foot. And the obligation (in wudhu) for the foot, if it is covered, is to wipe over it. There is no evidence for the condition of thickness, or of a binding covering in which no part of the foot is left apparent. Hence, if the sock was thin and had some tears in it whereby the colour of the skin was left apparent, one wipes over it – for the lack of evidence prohibiting such.

And Allah knows best.


الاكثر مشاهدة

1. جماع الزوجة في الحمام ( عدد المشاهدات127301 )
6. مداعبة أرداف الزوجة ( عدد المشاهدات62441 )
9. حكم قراءة مواضيع جنسية ( عدد المشاهدات58479 )
11. حکم نزدیکی با همسر از راه مقعد؛ ( عدد المشاهدات55639 )
12. لذت جویی از باسن همسر؛ ( عدد المشاهدات55144 )
13. ما الفرق بين محرَّم ولا يجوز؟ ( عدد المشاهدات51717 )
14. الزواج من متحول جنسيًّا ( عدد المشاهدات49852 )
15. حكم استعمال الفكس للصائم ( عدد المشاهدات44090 )

مواد تم زيارتها

التعليقات


×

هل ترغب فعلا بحذف المواد التي تمت زيارتها ؟؟

نعم؛ حذف